Free Newsletter
Register for our Free Newsletters
Newsletter
Zones
Airport, Border and Port Safety and Security
Left Nav Sep
Bioterrorism
Left Nav Sep
Civil Aircraft
Left Nav Sep
Civil Airlines, Airports and Services
Left Nav Sep
Communications and Navigation
Left Nav Sep
Education, Training and Professional Services
Left Nav Sep
Manufacturing and Materials
Left Nav Sep
Military and Defence Facilities
Left Nav Sep
Military Aviation
Left Nav Sep
Military Vehicles
Left Nav Sep
Naval Systems
Left Nav Sep
Personal Equipment
Left Nav Sep
Software and IT Services
Left Nav Sep
Space and Satellite
Left Nav Sep
Weapons, Ammunition and Explosives
Left Nav Sep
View All
Other Carouselweb publications
Carousel Web
Defense File Logo
New Material Logo
Pro Health Service Zone
Pro Manufacturing Zone
Prosecurity Zone
Web Lec Logo
Pro Engineering Zone
 
 
 
News

Air Transport Association Responds to DOT Claim of Competition


Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/defensef/public_html/components/com_zone/handleHTML.php on line 623
Air Transport Association Of America (ATA)
: 30 October, 2008  (Company News)
The Air Transport Association of America (ATA), the industry trade association for the leading U.S. airlines, today issued the following statement in response to the Department of Transportation (DOT) claim that auctions will lead to more competition and lower fares at slot-controlled airports:
The DOT today attempted yet another rationale in support of its unwavering desire to force untested, highly controversial slot auctions at New York-area airports. Its never-ending but imaginative claims are beginning to seem like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks.



It seems as if DOT has reversed course from its earlier astonishing claims that slot auctions will reduce congestion. DOT now claims that since New York is not a competitive market, auctions are necessary to increase competition and lower fares. Let’s set the record straight: New York is the most competitive market in the United States, with nearly 80 airlines serving JFK, La Guardia and Newark airports. So it is hard to imagine why New York would somehow benefit from even more competition – even assuming that auctions would attract carriers not now serving New York airports.



DOT compares fares in second quarter 2007 to fares in second quarter 2008 to demonstrate that average fares increased 8 percent. Given that the price of a barrel of oil during this same period increased nearly 100 percent – from around $65 a barrel to $124 a barrel – the more appropriate question might be why airfares increased so little. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, who vehemently opposes auctions, estimates that fares could increase by as much as 12 percent and that as many as 30 small- and medium- sized markets could lose service to New York under the illegal DOT auction scheme.



This latest argument sadly confirms the Department’s willingness to spin its wheels to mask its failure to implement proven operational and airspace redesign measures that will enhance capacity and reduce flight delays in the New York area. Auctions do not enhance capacity or give passengers more options and they do not result in lower fares.
Bookmark and Share
 
Home I Editor's Blog I News by Zone I News by Date I News by Category I Special Reports I Directory I Events I Advertise I Submit Your News I About Us I Guides
 
   Â© 2012 DefenseFile.com
Netgains Logo